Search results
Apr 30, 2018 · 30 April 2018 Trevor Padasian discusses the Federal Court’s landmark decision in Indira Gandhi. INTRODUCTION Monday, 29 January 2018, was a momentous day. On that day, the Federal Court (“FC”) set aside the unilateral conversion to Islam of three children in the long-running case of Indira Gandhi a/p Mutho v Pengarah Jabatan Agama Islam Perak & Ors and other appeals [2018] 1 MLJ 545 ...
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain is a historic case involving the former Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi, facing serious allegations of electoral malpractices and misuse of power during her 1971 election campaign. The case examined significant issues relating to the fairness of democratic procedures, the boundaries of judicial review ...
Oct 31, 2023 · The Court of Appeal set April 5 next year for an open-court hearing of M Indira Gandhi’s appeal to commence contempt proceedings over police’s alleged failure to recover her daughter taken by ...
Jan 29, 2018 · The ruling overturned the unilateral conversion of Hindu mother M. Indira Gandhi's children by her Muslim ex-husband, ending her nearly decade-long ordeal. Read more at straitstimes.com.
Apr 15, 2023 · Petitioner: Indira Nehru Gandhi (Smt.) Vs. Respondent: Raj Narain & Anr. Date of Judgment: 24/06/1975. Citation: 1975 AIR 1590 1975 SCC (2) 159. For many reasons, the case of Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain was a watershed moment. It was the first time in independent India’s history that a Prime Minister’s election was postponed. In the ...
Justice Datuk Dr Hamid Sultan Abu Backer ― who was the dissenting judge in the Court of Appeal bench that recently upheld the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam ― noted that the “pendaftar Muallaf” or registrar of Muslim converts who had registered the children as Muslims, fell under the purview of the Perak Islamic Religious Department (JAIPk) director.
May 3, 2020 · In conclusion, Maneka Gandhi’s case, gave the term ‘personal liberty’ widest possible interpretation and gave effect to the intention of the drafters of the Constitution. This case, while adding a whole new dimension to the concept of ‘personal liberty’, extended the protection of Art. 14 to the personal liberty of every person and ...
