Search results
Fallacy that occurs when a speaker attacks another person rather than his or her argument. Slippery slope. Fallacy that occurs when a person argues that one action will inevitably lead to a series of other actions. Red herring. Fallacy that occurs when a speaker poses an argument that is meant to distract from the argument at hand. Appeal to ...
Avoid these common fallacies in your own arguments and watch for them in the arguments of others. Slippery Slope: This is a conclusion based on the premise that if A happens, then eventually through a series of small steps, through B, C,..., X, Y, Z will happen, too, basically equating A and Z. So, if we don't want Z to occur, A must not be ...
A slippery slope fallacy is when you describe a slippery slope that is not in fact a slippery slope. Saying that legalizing gay marriage will inevitably lead towards legalizing men marrying objects or dogs is a fallacy. Saying banning unions will inevitably lead to dead workers is not a slippery slope.
Slippery Slope is a specific type of logical fallacy. A logical fallacy is a flawed argument. There are many different types of logical fallacy. Slippery slope is one example of a fallacy. It is an argument that suggests taking a minor action will lead to major and sometimes ludicrous consequences.
May 9, 2018 · This chapter focuses on one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy called the slippery slope. According to Patrick Hurley in A Concise Introduction to Logic, “the fallacy of slippery slope is a variety of the false cause fallacy. It occurs when the conclusion of an argument rests on an alleged chain reaction and there is not sufficient ...
It is the slippery slope fallacy to say if you allow X at some level of Y, then X is going to be possible at a different, unrelated level of Y.
How does the slippery slope fallacy work? The slippery slope fallacy occurs when a slippery slope argument suggests that a relatively small first step will lead to a chain of related events culminating in some significant (usually negative) effect. The argument does not provide sufficient evidence to support this chain of events.
