Thurgood Marshall
Search results
Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law, according to which racial segregation did not necessarily violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which nominally guaranteed "equal protection" under the law to all people.
Jun 26, 2024 · Separate but equal, the legal doctrine that once allowed for racial segregation in the United States. The doctrine held that so long as segregation laws affected white and Black people equally, those laws did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Oct 29, 2009 · Learn about the 1896 Supreme Court case that upheld racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. Find out how the case challenged the constitutional rights of Black people and paved the way for Jim Crow laws.
Dec 6, 2018 · Learn about the doctrine of separate but equal, which allowed racial segregation as long as facilities and services were equal. Explore the landmark cases of Plessy v. Ferguson and Sweatt v. Painter, and how they challenged and changed this doctrine.
Learn about the infamous Supreme Court decision in 1896 that allowed racial segregation laws in the United States. Find out the background, the case, the holding, and the aftermath of the "separate but equal" doctrine that was overruled by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".
Jan 4, 2022 · The Supreme Court's 1896 ruling upheld a Louisiana law that mandated racial segregation on trains, despite the 14th Amendment. The case was a result of a planned act of civil disobedience by Homer Plessy, a mixed-race man who challenged the law.
