Search results
Intellectual Property Case Updates - Malaysia. Cancellation of Registered Trade Mark for Non-use : No Burden On Registered Proprietor To Prove Use Until and Unless a Prima Facie Case of Non-Use Has Been Established. Liwayway Marketing Corporation v. Oishi Group Public Co Ltd.
Market-leading rankings and editorial commentary - see the top law firms & lawyers for Intellectual property in Malaysia
Intellectual Property Case Updates - Malaysia. Former Licensees Found Liable For Trade Mark Infringement After Withdrawal of Consent By Trade Mark Owner. Facts. Low Chi Yong (trading as Reynox Fertichem Industries) v Low Chi Hong & Anor .
Decision of the Federal Court. The 1st and 2nd Appellants succeeded in obtaining leave to appeal to the Federal Court (the apex Court in Malaysia). The Federal Court was asked to answer, among others, the following legal questions :- . (a) whether a TDO could be applied for on an ex parte basis under Section 9 of the.
24 Mei 2021 · In a landmark decision today, the Intellectual Property High Court in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia declared that the sale, offer for sale, distribution and/or supply of TV Boxes or illicit streaming devices (ISDs) that can provide unauthorised access to copyrighted works, constitutes copyright infringement under the Copyright Act 1987.
10 Feb 2021 · KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 10 — A company based in i-City, Shah Alam is the first to be charged in court for the offence of promoting hardware and software that bypass technological protection measures against copyrighted broadcast work.
Registration with the Malaysian Intellectual Property Corporation (MyIPO) affords preliminary legal protection of intellectual property and is a pre-requisite for most statutory protections[1] barring exceptions such as Copyright which receive automatic protection upon publication.[2]
