Search results
R v Prince (1875) LR 2 CCR 154. Absolute liability – Mens rea of abduction under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. Facts. Henry Prince (H) was convicted under to section 55 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 of taking an unmarried girl under the age of 16 out of the possession of her father without the father’s consent.
R v Prince (1875) LR 2 CCR 154. The appellant was charged with taking an unmarried girl under the age of 16 out of the possession of her father contrary to s.55 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
May 30, 2024 · Henry Prince (“The Prisoner”) was convicted under 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, s. 55, for unlawfully taking an Annie Phillips (“Girl”) under the age of sixteen out of the possession and against the will of her father.
Oct 21, 2020 · R v. Prince (1875) - Mistake of Fact. RITUPORNA GUPTA , 21 October 2020 Share Bookmark. Court : Brief : The Court held that Mistake of fact does not stand as a defense to a crime where the statute making the act a crime contains no requirement of knowledge of that fact to begin with.
Rex v. Prince, L.R. 2 C.C.R. 154 (1875), was an English case that held the mens rea necessary for criminal liability should be required for the elements central to the wrongfulness of the act, and that strict liability should apply to the other elements of the statute, such as the believed age of an abductee being irrelevant.
Brief Fact Summary. Defendant was convicted under a statute making it unlawful to take any unmarried girl under the age of sixteen out of the possession and without the consent of her parents. Although the girl taken by Defendant was actually 14 years old, she had told the Defendant, and the defendant reasonably believed that the girl was 18.
Get Regina v. Prince, L.R. 2 Cr. Cas. Res. 154 (1875), Court for Crown Cases Reserved, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
