Yahoo Malaysia Web Search

Sign In

Search results

  1. www.e-lawresources.co.uk › Routledge-v-MackayRoutledge v Mckay [1954] 1 WLR 615 Court of Appeal -...

    Routledge v Mckay [1954] 1 WLR 615 Court of Appeal. The claimant acquired a Douglas BSA motorcycle and sidecar by exchanging another motorcycle and paying £30.

  2. www.lawteacher.net › cases › terms-casesTerms of The Contract Case Summaries - LawTeacher.net

    Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615. The defendant stated that a motor cycle, the subject matter of the proposed sale, was a 1942 model. In the written contract, signed a week later, no mention was made of the date of the model.

  3. Images

    • [Case Law] ['lapse of time'] Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615 - YouTube
    • Routledge V Mckay (1954) 1 W.L.R. 615 | PDF | Misrepresentation ...
    • CASE EXAMPLE Routledge v McKay 1954 1 WLR 615 The claimant acquired a ...
    • Routledge v McKay Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays ...
    • PPT - Pre-contractual statements and misrepresentation PowerPoint ...

    View all

  4. www.legum.app › courses › law-of-contractLegum Case Brief: Routledge v Mckay

    Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615. Material Facts: The claimant entered negotiations with the defendant for the acquisition of a motorcycle. Although the motorcycle was actually a 1936 model, the claimant was orally informed by the defendant that the motorcycle was a 1942 model.

  5. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Routledge_v_McKayRoutledge v McKay - Wikipedia

    Routledge v McKay is a 1954 English contract law case, concerning the difference between a term and a representation.

  6. www.casemine.com › judgement › ukRoutledge v McKay & Ors | [1954] 1 WLR 615 - CaseMine

    Routledge v McKay & Ors England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mar 10, 1954. Full. Judgment. Subsequent. References. CaseIQ. (AI Recommendations) Routledge v McKay & Ors. Smart Summary (Beta) Facts: The registration books or log books showed that a motor cycle combination was a late 1941 or 1943 model.

  7. everything.explained.today › Routledge_v_McKayRoutledge v McKay explained - Everything Explained Today

    Routledge v McKay is a 1954 English contract law case, concerning the difference between a term and a representation. Facts The claimant bought a 1936 Douglas motorcycle outfit in a part-exchange deal which required him to pay a balance of £30.

  8. www.bailii.org › openlaw › contractBAILII - BAILII OpenLaw - Contract Law

    Routledge v McKay & Ors (BAILII: [1954] EWCA Civ 8)[1954] 1 All ER 855; [1954] 1 WLR 615 (CA)