Search results
22 hours ago · This essay about Federalist No. 78 by Alexander Hamilton examines its significance in American constitutional interpretation. It highlights Hamilton’s advocacy for an independent judiciary emphasizing the importance of judges being free from political pressures to ensure impartial justice.
- Federalist No. 78: the Judiciary’s Role in a Galactic Empire
In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton argues that the judiciary...
- Federalist No. 78: the Judiciary’s Role in a Galactic Empire
Jun 12, 2024 · The Federalist Papers also provide interpretation for key constitutional provisions, such as Hamilton's discussion of the judiciary's role in Federalist No. 78, advocating for an independent judicial branch to safeguard the Constitution.
6 days ago · Here is Hamilton's text in Federalist No. 78: The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. Hamilton said nothing at all about the Court's being the "final ...
Jun 27, 2024 · Or, as Alexander Hamilton wrote in The Federalist Papers, “ ‘there is no liberty if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers.’ ” The Federalist No. 78, at 466 (quoting 1 Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws 181 (10th ed. 1773)).
2 days ago · In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton advocated the doctrine of a written document held as a superior enactment of the people. "A limited constitution can be preserved in practice no other way" than through courts which can declare void any legislation contrary to the Constitution.
3 days ago · Federalist papers, series of 85 essays on the proposed new Constitution of the United States and on the nature of republican government, published between 1787 and 1788 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in an effort to persuade New York state voters to support ratification.
Jun 17, 2024 · In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton argues that the judiciary must be distinct and independent from the other branches of government—the executive and the legislative. This separation ensures that judges can make impartial decisions free from political influence.
