Search results
Jun 25, 2014 · Petitioner McElroy an Australian film maker, and his movie production company, Ayer Productions, envisioned, sometime in 1987, for commercial viewing and for Philippine and international release, the historic peaceful struggle of the Filipinos at EDSA.
The Supreme Court ruled that the production of the motion picture "The Four Day Revolution" by Ayer Productions did not constitute an unlawful intrusion on the right to privacy of Senator Juan Ponce Enrile.
AYER PRODUCTIONS PTY. LTD. v. IGNACIO M. CAPULONG, GR No. 82380, 1988-04-29. Facts: Petitioner Hal McElroy, an Australian film maker, and his movie production company, petitioner Ayer Productions Pty. Ltd. ("Ayer Productions"), [1] envisioned, sometime in 1987, the filming for commercial viewing and for Philippine and... international release ...
1. On 7 April 1988, petitioners in G.R. No. 82380 asked for deletion of "McElroy and McElroy Film Productions" as party petitioner stating that it was not a separate company but merely a corporate tradename used by Ayer Productions. "McElroy and McElroy Film Productions" will therefore be disregarded in this Decision. 2. Annex "A" of the Petitions.
Feb 4, 2024 · Ayer Productions and Hal McElroy separately contested the RTC’s decision, alleging it was an unconstitutional prior restraint on their freedom of expression. The Supreme Court consolidated these petitions in March 1988, partially lifting the TRO to allow filming parts not referring to Enrile.
Feb 14, 2011 · Ayer Production PTY Ltd. V Capulong (1988) F: Pivate respondent Juan Ponce Enrile filed an action in the RTC of Makati to enjoin the petitioners from producing the movie "The Four Day Revolution," a documentary of the EDSA Revolution in 1986 on the ground that it violated his right to privacy.
Apr 29, 1988 · Ayer Productions Pty. Ltd. vs. Capulong, 160 SCRA 861, April 29, 1988 - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.
