Yahoo Malaysia Web Search

Search results

  1. Nov 12, 2013 · Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Facts. Issues. Petitioner's Arguments.

  2. Apr 23, 2024 · Judgement in Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of CrPC and no preliminary inquiry is permissible if the information received discloses the commission of any cognizable offence.

  3. Lalitha Kumari (born 18 May 1967) is an Indian actress who worked in Tamil films. She is the daughter of Tamil actor C. L. Anandan and the younger sister of actress Disco Shanti . Personal life. Lalitha Kumari married actor Prakash Raj in 1994 and the couple has two daughters and a son (who died in 2004 [citation needed] ).

  4. May 8, 2024 · This petition was filed before the Supreme Court by Lalita kumari who is minor through her father under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950(COI) for the issuance of writ of Habeas Corpus for the protection of his minor daughter who has been kidnapped.

  5. Aug 15, 2023 · The case of Lalita Kumari vs. State of UP is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India that deals with the issue of police inaction in the face of cognizable offences, thereby addressing the importance of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.

  6. Jan 31, 2024 · The Supreme Court held in 2013 that police must file a FIR if the information reveals a cognizable offense, and cannot decline to file a FIR based on their doubts. The case also laid down guidelines for police officers to record FIRs and investigate the matter, and introduced the concept of zero FIR.

  7. A case involving the question of whether a police officer has discretion in registering an FIR under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Supreme Court held that the provisions are mandatory and the police officer has no discretion in the matter.