Yahoo Malaysia Web Search

Search results

  1. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Max_StirnerMax Stirner - Wikipedia

    Johann Kaspar Schmidt (25 October 1806 – 26 June 1856), known professionally as Max Stirner, was a German post-Hegelian philosopher, dealing mainly with the Hegelian notion of social alienation and self-consciousness. [3] .

  2. Jun 27, 2002 · Max Stirner (1806–1856) is the author of Der Einzige und sein Eigenthum (1844). This book is usually known as The Ego and Its Own in English, but a more literal, and informative, translation would be The Unique Individual and their Property .

  3. Jun 27, 2002 · Max Stirner (1806–1856) is best known as the author of the idiosyncratic and provocative book entitled Der Einzige und sein Eigenthum (1844). Familiar in English as The Ego and Its Own (a more literal translation would be The Unique Individual and his Property ), both the form and content of Stirner's work are disconcerting.

  4. Jun 22, 2024 · Max Stirner was a German antistatist philosopher in whose writings many anarchists of the late 19th and the 20th centuries found ideological inspiration. His thought is sometimes regarded as a source of 20th-century existentialism.

  5. The Ego and Its Own (German: Der Einzige und sein Eigentum), also known as The Unique and Its Property is an 1844 work by German philosopher Max Stirner.

  6. Sep 25, 2019 · So said Max Stirner, one of the most radical philosophers of the nineteenth century. Born Johann Kaspar Schmidt in Bayreuth in 1806, Stirner (a pseudonym that meant “highbrow”) became one of the most notorious members of the Young Hegelian circle of intellectuals.

  7. Jun 13, 2024 · Max Stirner. (1806—1856) Quick Reference. (1806–56) German firebrand. Originally Johann Kasper Schmidt, Stirmer is remembered philosophically for Der Einziger und sein Eigenthum (1845, trs. as The Ego and His Own, 1907).

  8. Jan 24, 2017 · This paper will examine Max Stirner’s notion of ownness as an alternative paradigm of freedom. I argue that ownness – which implies a radical form of self-ownership or self-mastery – is not reducible to any of the familiar categories of freedom such as negative or positive liberty; nor does it fit in with the republican model of liberty ...

  9. Jun 20, 2024 · Of all possible responses to Max Stirner's work, indifference is perhaps the most unlikely. But Stirner's book is not only striking and provocative; it has also played an important, if neglected, role in the history of political thought.

  10. Stirner attacked any revolutionary mentality relying on moral postulates or dependent on an "ought" (Sollen) in the belief that evil resided and consisted in the very existence of ideals. The point here is not that Stirner convinced Marx that what passed for revolutionary enthusiasm among the Young-Hegelians was bogus.