2019
Search results
BY NICK BOSTROM [Published in Philosophical Quarterly (2003) Vol. 53, No. 211, pp. 243‐255. (First version: 2001)] This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1)
Apr 28, 2003 · It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we shall one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. I discuss some consequences of this result.
Apr 28, 2003 · Nick Bostrom. The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 53, Issue 211, April 2003, Pages 243–255, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00309. Published: 28 April 2003. Cite. Permissions. Share. Abstract.
Mar 25, 2020 · Nick Bostrom’s Simulation Argument (SA) has many intriguing theological implications. We work out some of them here. We show how the SA can be used to develop novel versions of the Cosmological and Design Arguments.
April 2003 ARE WE LIVING IN A COMPUTER SIMULATION? By NICK BOSTROM I argue that at least one of the following propositions is true: (i) the human species is very likely to become extinct before reaching a 'posthuman' stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely
It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. A number of other consequences of this result are also discussed. Like. Recommend.
Apr 1, 2003 · N. Bostrom. Published 1 April 2003. Computer Science, Philosophy. The Philosophical Quarterly. TLDR. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that the authors will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless they are currently living in a simulation. Expand. View via Publisher. stafforini.com.
