Search results
Learn about the UK law case of Routledge v Grant, where the court ruled that an offer of sale can be withdrawn before acceptance. Find out the facts, issues, decision and reasoning of this contract law principle.
Citations: (1828) 4 Bingham New Cases 653; 130 ER 920. Facts. The defendant put an offer on the claimant’s lease, hoping to take possession on or before the 25th of July for a term of 21 years. In his offer, the defendant asked for a reply by April 29th.
Learn the key point and facts of Routledge v Grant (1828), a case on offer and acceptance in contract law. Find out how the court held that an offer can be withdrawn at any time before acceptance, regardless of any promise to keep it open.
May 28, 2024 · Facts and judgement for Routledge v Grant [1828] 4 Bing 653; [1828] 1 WLUK 31; 130 ER 920: KEY POINTS• Offer and acceptance are the building blocks of a contract. An offer presents specifi...
Legum case brief on Routeledge v Grant. The principle(s) in this case: A promise to keep an offer open is not binding without consideration from the offeree; an offer can be revoked at any time if the offeree gives no consideration in response to a promise to keep the offer open.
A legal case from 1828 about a lease agreement between a landlord and a tenant. The landlord offered to sell the property and grant a lease with an option to extend the term, but the tenant accepted the offer and then refused to take possession.
Routledge v Grant. (1828) 6 LJCP 166. Common Pleas. NB It is probably best to skip the next case until you have studied the section on consideration. Grant wrote to Routledge offering to purchase the lease of his house. The offer was to remain open for six weeks.
