Yahoo Malaysia Web Search

Search results

  1. ARBITRATION (DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL) CLINTON TAN Advocates & Solicitors. Home

    • About Us

      The firm is helmed by Mr Clinton Tan whose experience is...

    • Practice Areas

      CLINTON TAN Advocates & Solicitors. Home. About Us. Practice...

    • Articles

      Tenaga Nasional Berhad v Bukit Lenang Development Sdn Bhd -...

    • Contact Us

      Office: E-12-06 & E-12-07, Plaza Mont Kiara, No. 2, Jalan...

  2. Principal of Clinton Tan · Practice Area: Arbitration, Civil and Commercial Litigation, Negligence, Corporate Disputes, Trusts, Bankruptcy and Insolvency. · Pengalaman: Clinton Tan ·...

  3. The firm is helmed by Mr Clinton Tan whose experience is concentrated in civil litigation and arbitration. He has argued cases at all levels of the Civil Courts of Malaya and has also appeared in international arbitration disputes in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and Singapore.

  4. Apr 12, 2020 · Tenaga Nasional Berhad v Bukit Lenang Development Sdn Bhd - An electrifying decision. ABSTRACT It is unlawful for electric utility companies (such as Tenaga Nasional Berhad “TNB”) to encroach on private lands to supply... Clinton Tan Kian Seng. Sep 4, 2018.

  5. In fact, under the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966, the Homebuyer’s Tribunal has the power to determine on any claim lodged by the homebuyer for any loss suffered or any matter concerning the homebuyer’s interest as a homebuyer arising out of the Sale and Purchase Agreement.

  6. Clinton Tan Kian Seng (Partner) Tel: 603-6201 5678 / Fax: 603-6203 5678. Email: ctk@thomasphilip.com.my. Website: www.thomasphilip.com.my. The Federal Court usually hears disputes through a panel of five Federal Court judges. Today is the first time that a panel comprising nine Federal Court judges was empanelled to hear and determine a dispute.

  7. Clinton Tan Kian Seng (Partner) Tel: 603-6201 5678 / Fax: 603-6203 5678. Email: ctk@thomasphilip.com.my. Website: www.thomasphilip.com.my. On 8th January 2020, the Federal Court dismissed a motion to review its own decision and ordered the Applicant to pay costs of RM 100,000.00 to the Respondent.