Yahoo Malaysia Web Search

Search results

  1. Feb 14, 2023 · The case of Griffiths v Peter Conway Ltd (1939) deals with a situation where a seller is sought to be held liable for the violation of Section 14 (3) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979. Facts of the case (Griffiths v Peter Conway) The claimant purchased from the defendants a Harris tweed coat.

  2. Grifths v Peter Conway Ltd [1939] concerns the alleged breach of the Sale of Goods Act. Keywords: Commercial law – Sale of goods – Coat – Skin damage – Liability – Sale of Goods Act. Facts: In the case of Grifths v Peter Conway Ltd [1939] , the plaintiff purchased a tailor-made coat from the defendants.

  3. Aug 15, 2011 · BSS referred to a case called Griffiths v Peter Conway Ltd [1939] 1 All ER 685 in which the purchaser bought a coat specially made for the purchaser. The coat was apparently fit for its purpose except that, because the purchaser had abnormally sensitive skin, the wearing of the coat caused the purchaser to contract dermatitis, a consequence ...

  4. Jan 14, 2018 · In Griffiths V. Peter Conway Ltd, a woman bought a coat and got dermatitis from we3aring the coat because her skin was sensitive to the material. She sued for damages, but it was held that such condition was peculiar to her and a normal person could wear the coat.

  5. Thus, in Griffiths v. Peter Conway Ltd. [1939] 1 All E.R.685, the buyer had a Harris tweed coat specially made for her by the seller. The coat caused her to contract dermatitis.

  6. Aug 19, 2011 · BSS referred to a case called Griffiths v Peter Conway Ltd [1939] 1 All ER 685 in which the purchaser bought a coat specially made for the purchaser.

  7. Griffiths v Peter Conway Ltd [1939] 1 All ER 685 The plaintiff bought a Harris Tweed, tailor-made coat from the defendants. Due to her abnormally sensitive skin, she contracted dermatitis from...

  1. Searches related to griffiths v peter conway

    griffiths v peter conway ltd