Search results
Oct 16, 2020 · In Idris v Public Prosecutor [1960] MLJ 296, the appellant had been convicted of the murder of his ex-wife. Except for certain evidence with regard to motive, the case for the prosecution consisted entirely of circumstantial. JAYARAMAN & ORS v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. evidence. In his summing-up the learned trial judge had said:—
- CPC- Jayaraman V PP Summary - JAYARAMAN & ORS v ... - Studocu
JAYARAMAN & ORS v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [1982] 2 MLJ...
- Studocu - Free summaries, lecture notes & exam prep
Studocu - Free summaries, lecture notes & exam prep -...
- CPC- Jayaraman V PP Summary - JAYARAMAN & ORS v ... - Studocu
JAYARAMAN & ORS v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [1982] 2 MLJ 306 FACTS : Some Malays went one night to destroy idols in a Hindu temple in Kerling. Some Indians had been expecting the attack and were guarding the temple, and as a result there was a fight.
JAYARAMAN & ORS v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [1982] 2 MLJ 306 Facts: There had earlier been a series of attacks on Hindu temples involving the desecration of certain idols.
Jayaraman & Ors v Public Prosecutor - [1982] - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Case regarding arrest under Malaysia.
We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
Oct 18, 2014 · Jayaraman v PP [1982] 2 MLJ 273. - This is an appeal of the High Court decision. So look at high court decision first. - The judge says arrest is constituted by a physical seizure or touching of the accused person’s body with a view to his detention. And it can also include by mere words without touching.
Aug 20, 2019 · Criminal Law and Procedure -- Charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder -- What constitutes arrest -- Oral statement made by accused before his arrest to a police officer of or above rank of Inspector -- Whether admissible -- Circumstantial evidence -- Whether burden on prosecution heavier than in case of direct evidence -- Criminal Pr...
