Search results
The plaintiff, Tenaga Nasional Berhad claims for costs and expenses incurred for emergency repairs and replacement of its underground cable, which was damaged due to excavation works carried
The plaintiff, Tenaga Nasional Berhad claims for costs and expenses incurred for emergency repairs and replacement of its underground cable, which was damaged due to excavation works carried out by third-party contractors hired by the defendants, in front of a house belonging to the defendants.
TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD. Federal Court, Putrajaya. Abdul Rahman Sebli, Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Hasnah Mohammed Hashim FCJJ. [Civil Appeal No: 02 (F)-65-11-2021 (W)] 13 December 2022. [2023] 2 MLRA 25. JUDGMENT.
Aug 20, 2023 · Case: Hemraj & Co Sdn Bhd v Tenaga Nasional Bhd [2023] 1 MLJ 785. Court: Federal Court (Putrajaya) Topic: Non-delegable Duty of Care. Facts: 1. It was an appeal against the decision of the Courts below that held the Appellant (referred to as the “First Defendant”) for negligence. 2.
Dec 29, 2022 · Hemraj v TNB involved a claim brought by Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB, national electricity provider) against a homeowner (Hemraj Sdn Bhd). Hemraj brought a Third-Party Claim against its contractor (Contractor). Hemraj had engaged the Contractor to complete excavation works at its bungalow.
Mar 21, 2023 · The Federal Court in its recent decision of Hemraj & Co Sdn Bhd v Tenaga Nasional Berhad clarified that there are two categories of non-delegable duty of care. The first category is where the acts delegated to a third party contractor is “exceptionally dangerous whatever precautions are taken”.
Abstract. BETWEEN HEMRAJ & CO SDN BHD (APPELLANT) AND TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD (RESPONDENT) Actions (login required) View Item. Downloads per month over past year. Loading...
