Yahoo Malaysia Web Search

Search results

  1. RAY, C.J. for the In Civil Appeal No. 887 of 1975 the appellant is Indira Nehru Gandhi and the respondent is Raj Narain. Civil Appeal No. 909 of 1975 is the cross objection of the respondent. On July 14, 1975 it was directed that both the appeals would be heard together.

  2. Aug 22, 2018 · Raj Narain was the political contender against Indira Gandhi for Rae Bareilly Constituency in 1971 Lok Sabha General Elections. Mrs. Gandhi won the election & congress won the house with sweeping majority.

  3. May 27, 2019 · Raj Narain alleged that Yashpal Kapoor had given a number of speeches amid 7th January 1971 to 25th January 1971 to support Indira Gandhi, however, the court found no proof to support that he gave those speeches with the endorsement of Indira Gandhi.

  4. Jun 19, 2022 · Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narain, popularly known as the ‘emergency case’ or ‘election case’ is a landmark judgement in Indian Judicial history for numerous reasons. India witnessed the first case in its history when a Prime minister’s election was invalidated. The aftermath that followed the judgement resulted in huge chaos.

  5. Oct 7, 2023 · The Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narain case involved allegations of election malpractice against Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in the 1971 Lok Sabha elections. Raj Narain contested the election’s validity, claiming that Gandhi exceeded campaign expenditure limits and that a government officer, Yashpal Kapur, improperly assisted her.

  6. Supreme Court of India. Indira Nehru Gandhi (Smt.) vs Raj Narain & Anr on 24 June, 1975. Equivalent citations: 1975 AIR 1590, 1975 SCC (2) 159, AIR 1975 SUPREME COURT 1590, 1975 2 SCC 159. Author: V.R. Krishnaiyer. Bench: V.R. Krishnaiyer. PETITIONER: INDIRA NEHRU GANDHI (SMT.) Vs. RESPONDENT: RAJ NARAIN & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT24/06/1975. BENCH:

  7. Indira Gandhi vs. Raj Narain was the landmark case that created history and led to the imposition of Emergency in India from 1975 to 1977. It is the case which questioned the powers of the judiciary, a showcase of how Parliament expected the judiciary to kneel down before them.