Search results
government of malaysia v gurcharan singh & ors That this is a salutary approach to the problem I have not the slightest doubt. Whether the article supplied is a necessary for the infant concerned is a question of fact and law and the fact must be found on the evidence adduced.
Government of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh & Ors [1971] 1 MLJ 211, the issue in this case was whether scholarship for a student who was a minor who attended practical training overseas amounted to contract for necessaries. The High Court held that the scholar agreement was void and unenforceable between the government and the minor.
FACTS This case is about the government of Malaysia as the plaintiff whom had sued Gurcharan Singh the first defendant whom is a promisor of a contract and ORS as the second and third defendant whom act as the sureties of the contract for breaching the contract made between them. The contract is about the government of Malaysia providing the ...
FLW0024 / SEPT 2020 JANNATUNNAAINUMAR GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA V GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS [1971] 1 MLJ 211 The presiding court: Ipoh High Court (Original Civil Jurisdiction) Judges: CHANG MIN TAT J Judgment Date: 21/12/1970 Legal counsels representing both parties Dato' Sheikh Abdul Rahman (Senior Federal Counsel, Miss Chan Loo Thye with him) for the plaintiff.
Govt of Malaysia v Gurcharan - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The document discusses various topics in Malaysian business law, including: 1) The definition of "necessaries" under contract law and what can be considered reasonably necessary goods and services for a minor based on their station in life.
View full document. In Government of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh, the facts were that the plaintiff sued the defendant breach of contract. The claim was $11,500-alleged to be the sum spent by the government in educating the first defendant. At the time of the contract, the defendant was a minor. The defendant had served the government for 3 ...
GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA V GURCHARAN SINGH [1971] 1 MLJ 211 LAC 2063 NAME: MUHAMMAD DZUL HAZIM BIN NUZULLUDIN 1192101. Facts of the case:. This case is about the Malaysia government as the plaintiff who sued the first defendant, Gurcharan Singh, who is a contract promisor, and ORS as the second and third defendant who serves as the sureties of the contract between them for breaching of the contract.
