Search results
In Government of Malaysia v Mahan Singh [1975] 2 MLJ 155, the plaintiff was a public servant whose employment was terminated by the Director of Operations. The termination was due to an unfavourable report on his work and conduct, which was never made available to him.
Government of Malaysia v Mahan Singh [1975] - plaintiff was a public servant whose employment was terminated by the Director of Operations - termination due to unfavourable report on his work and conduct, which was never made available to him – HC; plaintiff succeeded – FC; Art has been complied with, a public servant’s employment may be ...
Government of Malaysia v , Mahan Singh (1975) 2 MLJ 155 - 1 - INTRODUCTIOIi GENERAL SURVEY OF TH~ SUBJECT. Arising from the discussion in 1956 for an
Article 135 (2) constitutionalises the natural justice rule of prior hearing. No public servant may be ‘dismissed’ or ‘reduced in rank’ without being given a reasonable opportunity of being heard: Government v Mahan Singh [1978] 2MLJ 133; IGP v Alan Nor Kamat [1988] 1 MLJ 260.
Chokolingo v A,G, of Trinidad and Tobago (I98I) I WLR. 106 2, Loh Kooi Choon v Government of Malaysia (I977) 2 MLJ, 187 3. Mahan Singh v The Government of Malaysia (I978) 2 MLJ, 133 4. 'Minister of Home Affairs v Fisher (I979) 3 AER 21 5~ Dato Menteri Othman v Dato Ombi Syed Alwi (I981) I MLJ 29 6. Ah Thian v The Government of Malaysi a (1976 ...
Government of Malaysia v. Rosalind Oh Lee Pek Inn [1973] 1 M.L.J. 22 281 Government of Malaysia & Anor. v. Selangor Pilot Association [1977] 1 M.L.J. 133 34 Government of Malaysia v. Zainal bin Hashim [1977] 2 M.L.J. 254 224,225,296,410 Government of the State of Kelantan v. The Government of the Federation of Malaya and Tunku Abdul Rahman ...
The climax of Siva’s early career at the Bar was surely his appeal to the Privy Council in Mahan Singh v Government of Malaysia [see (1978) 2 MLJ 133]. He was not daunted by the powerful judgements of Suffian L.P., Lee Hun Hoe C.J.(Borneo) and Ong Hock Sim F.J., who unanimously had held against him in the Federal Court [see (1975) 2 MLJ 155].
