Search results
POLYGRAM RECORDS SDN BHD v THE SEARCH & ANOR [1994] 3 MLJ 127] FACTS. ISSUE. 7 October 1984. The plaintiffs, Polygram Records Sdn Bhd, entered into a written agreement ('the first contract') with a rock group, The Search ('the group'). They were signed on by Eric Yeoh ('Eric').
Tort -- Inducement of breach of contract -- Recording contract -- Whether group induced to breach contract with recording company. 1994 3 MLJ 127at 128. The plaintiffs, Polygram Records Sdn Bhd, entered into a written agreement ('the first contract') with a rock group, The Search ('the group'), on 7 October 1984.
Jul 23, 2021 · The case best known for this proposition is Polygram Records Sdn Bhd v The Search & Anor [1994] 3 MLJ 127. In his judgment, Sinnadurai Jsaid that to apply section 28 to every contract which contains a covenant restricting a party from practising his trade or profession both during as well as after the contract as a restraint of trade “would ...
The defendant had previously signed a contract with the plaintiff to have exclusive recording rights for the defendants. However, at the end of 1987, the group decided to record an album under a new company, Go-Search, a company that was incorporated by the defendants’ themselves.
POLYGRAM RECORDS SDN BHD v THE SEARCH & ANOR [1994] 3 MLJ 127 Fakta kes: Pada 7 Oktober 1984, plaintif telah memasuki satu perjanjian bertulis (kontrak pertama) dengan satu kumpulan rock yang bernama The Search. Perjanjian tersebut telah ditandatangani oleh Eric Yeoh, seorang pemuzik dan pengurus plaintif.
Jul 23, 2021 · The case best known for this proposition is Polygram Records Sdn Bhd v The Search & Anor [1994] 3 MLJ 127. In his judgment, Sinnadurai Jsaid that to apply section 28 to every...
Polygram's claims against the group and the new company for inducing breach of contract failed. 1) The group entered into two recording contracts with Polygram, the first in 1984 and the second in 1985.
