Search results
Feb 4, 2024 · Ayer Productions and Hal McElroy separately contested the RTC’s decision, alleging it was an unconstitutional prior restraint on their freedom of expression. The Supreme Court consolidated these petitions in March 1988, partially lifting the TRO to allow filming parts not referring to Enrile.
The Supreme Court ruled that the production of the motion picture "The Four Day Revolution" by Ayer Productions did not constitute an unlawful intrusion on the right to privacy of Senator Juan Ponce Enrile.
Jun 25, 2014 · Petitioner McElroy an Australian film maker, and his movie production company, Ayer Productions, envisioned, sometime in 1987, for commercial viewing and for Philippine and international release, the historic peaceful struggle of the Filipinos at EDSA.
AYER PRODUCTIONS PTY. LTD. v. IGNACIO M. CAPULONG, GR No. 82380, 1988-04-29. Facts: Petitioner Hal McElroy, an Australian film maker, and his movie production company, petitioner Ayer Productions Pty. Ltd. ("Ayer Productions"), [1] envisioned, sometime in 1987, the filming for commercial viewing and for Philippine and... international release ...
Petitioner Hal McElroy, an Australian film maker, and his movie production company, petitioner Ayer Productions Pty. Ltd. ("Ayer Productions"), [1] envisioned, sometime in 1987, the filming for commercial viewing and for Philippine and international release, the historic peaceful struggle of the Filipinos at EDSA (Epifanio de los Santos Avenue ...
The Supreme Court decision on Ayer Productions, et al. vs. Hon. Ignacio Capulong, et al. (1990)
AYER PRODUCTIONS PTY. LTD. v. IGNACIO M. CAPULONG, GR No. 82380, 1988-04-29. Facts: Issues: Petitioners' claim that in producing and filming "The Four Day Revolution", they are exercising their freedom of speech and of expression protected under our Constitution.
