Search results
Jan 4, 2002 · The history of war, in that quarter of the globe, is no longer a history of nations subdued and empires overturned, but of towns taken and retaken, of battles that decide nothing, of retreats more beneficial than victories, of much effort and little acquisition.
Federalist No. 8, titled "Consequences of Hostilities Between the States", is a political essay by Alexander Hamilton and the eighth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in the New-York Packet on November 20, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist Papers were published.
Dec 20, 2021 · FEDERALIST No. 7. The Same Subject Continued (Concerning Dangers from Dissensions Between the States) FEDERALIST No. 8. The Consequences of Hostilities Between the States . FEDERALIST No. 9. The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection . FEDERALIST No. 10.
Summary. If accepted as an "established truth" that war between separate parts was probable if the Union were dismembered, such wars between the states would occasion much greater distress than in countries that maintained regular standing armies.
The Federalist Papers Summary and Analysis of Essay 8. >Summary: Hamilton begins this Federalist paper by assuming that he has proven to his readers that the union provides safety from foreign attack, and wants to proceed and address some of the other consequences of the dissolution of the states.
Federalist Number (No.) 8 (1787) is an essay by British-American politician Alexander Hamilton arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution. The full title of the essay is "The Consequences of Hostilities Between the States."
Apr 21, 2023 · Federalist No. 8 is the first of the Federalist Papers to explain just how standing armies are “problematic and uncertain.” Two quick examples: “it is of the nature of war to increase the executive at the expense of the legislative authority” and “the military state becomes elevated above the civil.”
