Yahoo Malaysia Web Search

Search results

  1. Facts. James Malone, an antique dealer in Dorking, claimed that intercepting his telephone conversations, on authority of a warrant by the Secretary of State for Home Affairs, was unlawful, and asked for an injunction against the Metropolitan Police Commissioner for monitoring his telephone.

  2. Facts. James Malone, an antique dealer in Dorking, claimed that intercepting his telephone conversations, on authority of a warrant by the Secretary of State for Home Affairs, was unlawful, and asked for an injunction against the Metropolitan Police Commissioner for monitoring his telephone.

  3. 1. The following fs an outline of the case as submitted to the European Commission of Human Rights, and of the procedure before the Commission. A. The substance of the application 2 . The applicant, Mr James Malone, is a United Kingdom citizen, born in 1937 and resident in Dorking, Surrey. In 1977 he was an antique dealer.

  4. CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM. (Application no. 8691/79) JUDGMENT. STRASBOURG. 2 August 1984. In the Malone case, The European Court of Human Rights, taking its decision in plenary session in application of Rule 50 of the Rules of Court and composed of the following judges: and also Mr. M.- A.

  5. case originated in an application (no. 8691/79) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission on 19 July 1979 by a United Kingdom national, Mr. James Malone.

  6. Jun 4, 2022 · The court considered the lawfulness of telephone tapping. The issue arose following a trial in which the prosecution had admitted the interception of the plaintiff’s telephone conversations under a warrant issued by the Secretary of State. The . . Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

  7. May 23, 2002 · The circumstances of the case. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. On 31 March 1987 the applicant was convicted by a jury at Chester Crown Court of four armed robberies committed between 5 and 30 April 1986. He was sentenced to fifteen years' imprisonment.