Yahoo Malaysia Web Search

Search results

  1. Feb 5, 2022 · Models for Evaluation of Undue Influence. This paper provides an explanation of some models that have helped shape a framework to evaluate undue influence. One of the 3 models provides statistical analysis and potential solutions on how to evaluate or assess undue influence in the legal system.

  2. The SCAM model was developed by Susan I. Bernantz, Ph.D., it contains four elements regarding undue influence: Susceptibility of the victim Presence of a confidential and trusting relationship between the victim and perpetrator

  3. freedomofmind.com › cult-mind-control › bite-model-pdf-downloadBITE Model of Authoritarian Control

    Steven Hassan developed the BITE Model© to describe cults’ specific methods to recruit and maintain control over people. “BITE” stands for Behavior, Information, Thought, and Emotional control. The BITE model should be used within the Influence Continuum Model to help determine authoritarian control.

  4. May 5, 2021 · The Scheflin Social Influence Model (SIM) (2015) was a significant feature of my doctoral dissertation: The BITE Model of Authoritarian Control: Undue Influence, Thought Reform, Brainwashing, Mind Control, Trafficking, and the Law.

  5. Mar 3, 2023 · The Social Influence Model (SIM) has these six components: 1. Influencer [Identity and Status] [Who] 2. Influencer’s Motives [Purpose] [Why] 3. Influencer’s Methods [Techniques] [What/How] 4. Circumstances [Timing & Setting] [Where/When] 5. Influencee’s Receptivity/Vulnerability [Individual Differences] [Who] 6. Consequences [Results] [What]

  6. Sep 1, 2016 · “Undue influence” means excessive persuasion that causes another person to act or refrain from acting by overcoming that person's free will and results in inequity. In determining whether a result was produced by undue influence, all of the following shall be considered:1. The vulnerability of the victim.

  7. The items in the BITE model of mind control were found to have a reliability score of .98, and a Cronbach’s alpha of .93 demonstrated internal consistency and validity. A principal component analysis identified one highly significant factor that captures undue influence: Authoritarian Control.