Yahoo Malaysia Web Search

Search results

  1. Jul 11, 2020 · The plaintiff (Government of Malaysia) entered into an agreement with the first defendant (Gurcharan Singh) as the promisor and the second and third defendants as sureties for providing a course of training at a Malayan Teacher's Training Institution.

    • Articles

      What is a Judgment Debtor Summons (JDS)? A judgment Debtor...

  2. This case concerns the Government of Malaysia as the plaintiff who sued Gurcharan Singh as the first defendant to promise the contract and ORS as the second and third defendant to act as the guarantors of the contract for breach of the contract made between them.

  3. Government OF Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh & ORS, [1971] 1 MLJ 211. another good case to read. Course. Social Psychology for Law (LAW036) 154Documents. Students shared 154 documents in this course. University. Universiti Teknologi MARA. Academic year:2020/2021. Uploaded by: Anonymous Student.

  4. In this action, the Government Of MALAYSIA sued the first defendant as the promisor and the second and third defendants as sureties for breach of an agreement in writing entered into by them with the plaintiff for

  5. Government of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh & Ors [1971] 1 MLJ 211, the issue in this case was whether scholarship for a student who was a minor who attended practical training overseas amounted to contract for necessaries. The High Court held that the scholar agreement was void and unenforceable between the government and the minor.

  6. The contract is about the government of Malaysia providing the first defendant a scholarship for his study at Malayan Teachers Training Institution with an agreement that the first defendant will serve the government in consideration for being trained as a teacher.

  7. Govt of Malaysia v Gurcharan - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The document discusses various topics in Malaysian business law, including: 1) The definition of "necessaries" under contract law and what can be considered reasonably necessary goods and services for a minor based on their station in life.

  1. Searches related to government of malaysia v gurcharan singh & ors

    government of malaysia v gurcharan singh & ors 1971 1 mlj 211