Search results
Routledge v Grant [1828] 4 Bing 653 The defendant contacted the claimant in writing, offering to purchase the lease of the claimant’s home. The offer stated that it would remain open to the claimant for a period of six weeks.
A case on offer and acceptance in contract law. The defendant withdrew his offer to lease a property before the claimant accepted it, and the claimant failed to prove he had extended his lease with his landlord.
May 28, 2024 · In this case, Defendant, Grant extended an offer to purchase a house to Plaintiff Routledge, outlining specific terms including the premium, lease duration, rental rates, and possession date. Grant's offer, like any offer, implied that it could be retracted at any point before acceptance.
Learn about the case of Routledge v Grant (1828), where the court held that an offer can be withdrawn at any time before acceptance. See the facts, issue, and judgment of this contract law case, and get premium notes and tutoring.
A legal case from 1828 about a lease agreement between a landlord and a tenant. The landlord offered to sell the property and grant a lease with an option to extend the term, but the tenant accepted the offer and then refused to take possession.
Sep 12, 2024 · Court: Court of Common Pleas Facts: The defendant (D) offered to purchase the lease of the claimant’s (C) house and stated that the offer would remain open for six weeks. Before the six-week period expired, D decided to withdraw the offer and sent a withdrawal letter to C. Despite receiving the
May 8, 2023 · A case on offer and acceptance in contract law. The court held that an offer can be withdrawn at any time before it is accepted and that acceptance must be communicated to the offeror.
